Section 308 of CrPC : Section 308: Trial of person not complying with conditions of pardon.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi was involved in a large-scale financial fraud case in Mumbai. The police arrested several individuals, including Ravi. During the investigation, Ravi agreed to become an approver (a witness for the prosecution) and accepted a tender of pardon under Section 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In exchange for his testimony against the main accused, Ravi was promised immunity from prosecution for his role in the fraud.
However, during the trial, the Public Prosecutor discovered that Ravi had deliberately concealed crucial information about the involvement of another key conspirator. The Public Prosecutor certified that Ravi had not complied with the conditions of the pardon by wilfully concealing essential information. Consequently, Ravi was put on trial for the original offence of financial fraud and for giving false evidence.
Before the trial commenced, the Court asked Ravi if he pleaded that he had complied with the conditions of the par...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!