Section 292 of CrPC : Section 292: Evidence of officers of the Mint.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A counterfeit currency case in Mumbai.
Details: During a police raid in Mumbai, a large quantity of counterfeit currency is seized. The police send the seized notes to the Note Printing Press for examination. An officer at the Note Printing Press examines the notes and prepares a report confirming that the notes are counterfeit.
Application of Section 292:
- Use of Report as Evidence: The report prepared by the officer of the Note Printing Press can be used as evidence in the trial against the accused, even if the officer is not called to testify in court.
- Summoning the Officer: If the court deems it necessary, it can summon the officer to testify about the contents of the report. However, the officer cannot be asked to produce the records on which the report is based.
- Restrictions on Disclosure: The officer cannot disclose any unpublished official records or the specific tests applied during the examination without permission from the General Manager of the Note Printing Press.
Example 2:
Scenario: A forgery case involving government documents in Delhi.
Details: A government official is accused of forging official documents. The documents are sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for examination. An officer at the laboratory examines the documents and prepares a report indicating that the documents are indeed forged.
Application of Section 292:
- Use of Report as Evidence: The forensic report can be used as evidence in the trial against the accused, even if the forensic officer is not called to testify in court.
- Summoning the Officer: The court may decide to summon the forensic officer to provide further details about the report. However, the officer cannot be compelled to produce the records on which the report is based.
- Restrictions on Disclosure: The forensic officer cannot disclose any unpublished official records or the specific tests applied during the examination without permission from the officer in charge of the Forensic Science Laboratory.
Example 3:
Scenario: A case of fake stamp papers in Chennai.
Details: A large consignment of fake stamp papers is discovered in Chennai. The stamp papers are sent to the Controller of Stamps and Stationery for verification. An officer examines the stamp papers and prepares a report confirming their falsity.
Application of Section 292:
- Use of Report as Evidence: The report from the Controller of Stamps and Stationery can be used as evidence in the trial against the accused, even if the officer is not called to testify in court.
- Summoning the Officer: The court may summon the officer to provide additional information about the report. However, the officer cannot be asked to produce the records on which the report is based.
- Restrictions on Disclosure: The officer cannot disclose any unpublished official records or the specific tests applied during the examination without permission from the officer in charge of the Controller of Stamps and Stationery.
Example 4:
Scenario: A case of questioned documents in a property dispute in Kolkata.
Details: In a property dispute, one party submits documents that the other party claims are forged. The documents are sent to the State Examiner of Questioned Documents for analysis. The examiner prepares a report indicating that the documents are forged.
Application of Section 292:
- Use of Report as Evidence: The report from the State Examiner of Questioned Documents can be used as evidence in the trial, even if the examiner is not called to testify in court.
- Summoning the Officer: The court may summon the examiner to provide further details about the report. However, the examiner cannot be compelled to produce the records on which the report is based.
- Restrictions on Disclosure: The examiner cannot disclose any unpublished official records or the specific tests applied during the examination without permission from the officer in charge of the State Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation.