Section 284 of CrPC : Section 284: When attendance of witness may be dispensed with and commission issued.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A high-profile corruption case is being tried in a court in Mumbai. One of the key witnesses is a senior government official who is currently posted in a remote area of Arunachal Pradesh. The official's testimony is crucial for the case, but traveling to Mumbai would cause significant delay and inconvenience.
Application of Section 284: The court in Mumbai decides that the attendance of the senior government official cannot be procured without unreasonable delay and expense. Therefore, the court issues a commission for the examination of the witness. A local magistrate in Arunachal Pradesh is appointed to record the testimony of the official, which is then sent to the court in Mumbai for consideration in the trial.
Example 2:
Scenario: During a trial in Delhi, it becomes necessary to examine the President of India as a witness. Given the high office held by the President, it is impractical to expect the President to attend the court in person.
Application of Section 284: In accordance with the proviso in Section 284, the court issues a commission for the examination of the President. A designated official, such as a senior judge, is appointed to record the President's testimony at a convenient location, ensuring that the ends of justice are...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.