Section 239 of CrPC : Section 239: When accused shall be discharged.

CrPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi was accused of theft and a police report was filed against him. The police report and accompanying documents were submitted to the Magistrate under Section 173. The Magistrate reviewed the evidence, including witness statements and CCTV footage, and found no substantial proof linking Ravi to the crime. The Magistrate also allowed both the prosecution and Ravi's defense lawyer to present their arguments. After careful consideration, the Magistrate concluded that the charges against Ravi were baseless. Therefore, the Magistrate discharged Ravi and recorded the reasons for his decision.

Example 2:

Priya was accused of fraud in a business transaction. The police conducted an investigation and submitted their report along with relevant documents to the Magistrate. During the preliminary examination, the Magistrate found inconsistencies in the evidence provided by the police. Priya's lawyer argued that the evidence was fabricated and presented additional documents proving her innocence. The prosecution failed to provide any convincing counterarguments. After hearing both sides, the Magistrate determined that there was no valid ground to proceed with the charges against Priya. Consequently, the Magistrate discharged Priya and documented the reasons for the discharge in the court records.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link