Orissa of CrPC : Orissa

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi, a resident of Bhubaneswar, is arrested by the police on suspicion of involvement in a serious crime. The police take Ravi into custody and begin their investigation. However, the investigation is complex and cannot be completed within the standard 24-hour period. Under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the police must produce Ravi before a Magistrate to seek an extension of his detention.

The Magistrate, following the amended provisions, requires Ravi to be produced in person for the first time. During this hearing, the Magistrate authorizes Ravi's detention for an additional period, allowing the police more time to complete their investigation. For subsequent extensions, Ravi can be produced either in person or through electronic video linkage, ensuring that his rights are protected while also accommodating the practical needs of the investigation.

Example 2:

Priya, a software engineer in Cuttack, is accused of cyber fraud. The police arrest her and start their investigation. Given the complexity of the case, the police realize they need more than 24 hours to gather all the necessary evidence. They produce Priya before a Magistrate within the initial 24-hour period to request an extension of her detention.

The Magistrate, adhering to the amended Section 167, ensures Priya is present in person for the first hearing. The Magistrate grants an extension of her detention, allowing the police additional time to investigate. For subsequent hearings, Priya can be produced via electro...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.