Section 137 of CrPC : Section 137: Procedure where existence of public right is denied.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A local farmer, Mr. Sharma, has built a fence across a pathway that villagers have used for decades to access a nearby river. The villagers file a complaint with the local Magistrate, claiming that Mr. Sharma's fence is obstructing a public right of way.
Application of Section 137:
- Order under Section 133: The Magistrate issues an order under Section 133 to Mr. Sharma to remove the fence, as it is causing obstruction to the public.
- Appearance and Denial: Mr. Sharma appears before the Magistrate and denies that the pathway is a public right of way, claiming it is part of his private property.
- Inquiry by Magistrate: The Magistrate then inquires into the matter to determine if there is any reliable evidence supporting Mr. Sharma's denial.
- Evidence Evaluation: If Mr. Sharma provides credible evidence, such as land records or witness testimonies, that the pathway is indeed private, the Magistrate will stay the proceedings until a competent court decides on the matter.
- Proceeding under Section 138: If Mr. Sharma fails to provide reliable evidence, the Magistrate will proceed under Section 138 to enforce the removal of the fence.
Example 2:
Scenario: A factory owner, Ms. Verma, has been discharging waste into a river that runs through the town. The local residents complain that the waste is causing a public nuisance and health hazard...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!