Section 110 of CrPC : Section 110: Security for good behaviour from habitual offenders.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi is a known habitual thief in his locality in Mumbai. Over the past few years, he has been arrested multiple times for house-breaking and theft. Despite serving short jail terms, he continues to engage in these activities. The local police have gathered substantial evidence of his repeated offenses and have reported this to the Executive Magistrate. The Magistrate, upon reviewing the evidence, decides to invoke Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Ravi is summoned to the court and is required to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond with sureties for his good behaviour for a period of two years. If Ravi fails to provide a satisfactory explanation, he will be required to sign the bond, ensuring that he will not engage in any criminal activities during this period, or face further legal consequences.

Example 2:

Sita runs a small shop in Delhi and has been repeatedly caught selling adulterated food products, violating the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Despite several warnings and fines, she continues this illegal practice. The local health inspector reports her habitual offenses to the Executive Magistrate. The Magistrate, considering the repeated violations and the potential harm to public health, decides to take action under Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Sita is called to the court and asked to show cause why she should not be required to execute a bond with sureties for her good behaviour for a period of one year. If Sita cannot provide a convincing reason, she will have to sign the bond, promising to cease her illegal activities, or face stricter penalties.