Section 27 of CrPC : Section 27: Jurisdiction in the case of juveniles.
CrPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi, a 15-year-old boy, is caught stealing a bicycle from his neighbor's house. Since the offence is not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and Ravi is under 16 years old, he is brought before the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court, recognizing his age, decides to try him under the provisions of the Children Act, 1960, which focuses on the treatment, training, and rehabilitation of youthful offenders rather than harsh punishment.
Example 2:
Sita, a 14-year-old girl, is involved in a minor altercation at school that results in her being charged with causing simple hurt. Given that the offence is not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and Sita is under 16 years old, she is brought before a court specially empowered under the Children Act, 1960. The court takes into account her age and the nature of the offence and opts for a rehabilitative approach, enrolling her in a counseling program and community service instead of a traditional criminal trial.
Example 3:
Arjun, a 13-year-old boy, is found guilty of vandalizing public property by spray-painting graffiti on a government building. Since the offence does not carry a punishment of death or life imprisonment, and Arjun is under 16 years old, he is brought before the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court, following the guidelines of the Children Act, 1960, decides to place Arjun in a juvenile rehabilitation center where he will receive education and vocational training to prevent future delinquent behavior.
Example 4:
Priya, a 12-year-old girl, is caught shoplifting from a local store. The offence is not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and Priya is under 16 years old. She is brought before a court that is specially empowered under the Children Act, 1960. The court, considering her young age and the minor nature of the offence, decides to place her under the supervision of a probation officer who will monitor her behavior and ensure she attends school regularly.
Example 5:
Manoj, a 15-year-old boy, is involved in a case of trespassing into a private property. Since the offence is not punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and Manoj is under 16 years old, he is brought before the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate. The court, adhering to the Children Act, 1960, decides to enroll Manoj in a community service program and provides him with counseling sessions to address the underlying issues that led to his behavior.