Section 163 of CrPC : Section 163: No Inducement To Be Offered

CrPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

A hypothetical scenario applying Section 163 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 could be as follows:

Rahul is detained by the police for questioning in connection with a theft. During the interrogation, Inspector Verma says to Rahul, "If you confess to the theft, I'll make sure the judge goes easy on you." Rahul, feeling pressured, admits to the crime. However, Rahul's confession could be deemed inadmissible in court because Inspector Verma's promise violates Section 163(1), which prohibits police officers from inducing a confession through promises.

Later, Rahul decides he wants to make a statement about his involvement of his own free will. Even though Inspector Verma believes Rahul may incriminate himself further, he does not dissuade him from speaking. This complies with Section 163(2), as the officer did not prevent Rahul from making a statement voluntarily.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.
Update: KanoonGPT Chat interface is launched for beta testing. Try it out here

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link