Rule 3A of CPC : Rule 3A: Decree against minor not to be set aside unless prejudice has been caused to his interests.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi, a 15-year-old minor, is involved in a property dispute case. His uncle, who has a conflicting interest in the property, is appointed as his guardian for the suit. The court passes a decree against Ravi, favoring the opposing party. Later, it is discovered that Ravi's uncle did not present crucial evidence that could have benefited Ravi's case because it would have harmed his own interests. Ravi's lawyer argues that the decree should be set aside because the uncle's adverse interest caused prejudice to Ravi's interests. The court agrees and sets aside the decree, allowing Ravi to have a fair trial with a new guardian.

Example 2:

Meena, a 16-year-old minor, is involved in a lawsuit regarding her inheritance. Her father, who is also a party to the suit and has a conflicting interest, is appointed as her guardian. The court issues a decree against Meena. Later, it is found that her father acted negligently by not attending important court hearings and failing to submit necessary documents, which resulted in a loss for Meena. Meena's new lawyer files a petition to set aside the decree, arguing that her father's gross negligence caused prejudice to her interests. The court reviews the case and decides to set aside the decree, allowing Meena to seek relief with a competent guardian.

Examp...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.