Rule 97 of CPC : Rule 97: Resistance or obstruction to possession of immovable property.
CPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Rajesh obtained a court decree stating that he is the rightful owner of a piece of land in Mumbai. When Rajesh went to take possession of the land, he found that Ramesh, the previous owner, had locked the gate and placed guards to prevent Rajesh from entering. Rajesh then filed an application in the court under Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, complaining about the resistance and obstruction by Ramesh. The court, upon receiving the application, initiated proceedings to address Rajesh's complaint and ensure that he could take possession of the property as per the decree.
Example 2:
Sita purchased a house in Delhi through a court auction after the previous owner, Mohan, defaulted on a loan. When Sita tried to move into the house, Mohan's relatives blocked her entry and refused to vacate the premises. Sita approached the court with an application under Rule 97, stating that she was being obstructed from taking possession of the house she legally purchased. The court then took up Sita's application, investigated the matter, and took necessary actions to remove the obstruction, allowing Sita to take possession of her new home.