Rule 6 of CPC : Rule 6: Application where rejected.

CPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Ravi filed a civil suit against Shyam for breach of contract in the District Court of Delhi. The court ruled in favor of Shyam. Dissatisfied with the judgment, Ravi filed an application for review of the decision. The review application was heard by a bench of three judges. Two judges found no merit in Ravi's application, while one judge believed there was an error in the original judgment. Since the majority of the judges (2 out of 3) were against the review, the application was rejected according to Rule 6(2) of Order XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Example 2:

Meera lost a property dispute case in the High Court of Mumbai and subsequently filed an application for review of the judgment. The review application was heard by a bench of two judges. One judge believed that there was a significant error in the original judgment, while the other judge found no such error. Since the court was equally divided (1-1), the application for review was rejected as per Rule 6(1) of Order XLVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link