Rule 21 of CPC : Rule 21: Re-hearing on application of respondent against whom ex parte decree made.
CPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Rajesh, a businessman, was involved in a civil dispute with his supplier, Suresh. Suresh filed an appeal against a lower court's decision in favor of Rajesh. The appellate court scheduled a hearing, but Rajesh did not receive the notice due to a clerical error at the post office. As a result, the court heard the appeal ex parte (in Rajesh's absence) and ruled in favor of Suresh.
Application of Rule 21: Rajesh, upon learning about the ex parte decree, can apply to the appellate court for a re-hearing. He must demonstrate that he did not receive the notice due to the postal err...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
In fact, any online course, certificate program, diploma in International Law, Technology Law, or whatever-new-hype-they-invent is usually just marketing sugarcoat. Don't let them sell you a PDF or Recorded Content and call it empowerment.
A course designed to truly empower you should be accessible — and preferably, free. That's why KanoonGPT will launch a Free AI 101 for Law Professionals course.
Also, quick reality check: Indians earn in INR ₹₹₹ — why on earth are we paying in Dollars $$$ for AI tools ? 🤨 Something doesn't add up.