Rule 33 of CPC : Rule 33: Power of Court of appeal.
CPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi files a lawsuit against Suresh and Mahesh, claiming that they both owe him Rs. 1,00,000. The trial court rules in favor of Ravi but only against Suresh, ordering Suresh to pay the full amount. Suresh appeals the decision, and both Ravi and Mahesh are respondents in the appeal. The Appellate Court reviews the case and finds that Suresh is not liable for the debt, but Mahesh is. The Appellate Court then has the power to pass a decree against Mahesh, even though Mahesh did not file an appeal or objection.
Example 2:
Priya sues her business partners, Anil and Sunil, for breach of contract, seeking damages of Rs. 5,00,000. The trial court issues a decree in favor of Priya but only against Anil. Anil appeals the decision, and Priya and Sunil are respondents in the appeal. The Appellate Court finds that Anil is no...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.