Rule 22 of CPC : Rule 22: Using answers to interrogatories at trial.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Rajesh files a civil suit against Sunita for breach of contract. During the discovery process, Rajesh sends a set of interrogatories (written questions) to Sunita, which she answers under oath. One of the questions is about whether Sunita received the payment for the contract, to which she answers "Yes."

Application of Rule 22: At the trial, Rajesh wants to use Sunita's answer to the interrogatory where she admitted receiving the payment. He presents this specific answer as evidence to support his claim that Sunita breached the contract despite receiving the payment.

Court's Role: The court may review all of Sunita's answers to the interrogatories. If the court finds that other...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.