Rule 11 of CPC : Rule 11: Order to answer or answer further.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Ramesh files a civil lawsuit against Suresh for breach of contract. During the discovery process, Ramesh sends a set of interrogatories (written questions) to Suresh to gather more information about the case. Suresh responds to some questions but omits answers to others and provides vague responses to a few.

Application of Rule 11: Ramesh can apply to the Court under Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, requesting an order that requires Suresh to provide complete and specific answers to the interrogatories he omitted or answered insufficiently. The Court may then direct Suresh to answer the questions either through a written affidavit or by appearing in person (viva voce examination) to provide the necessary information.

Example 2:

Scenario: Priya is involved in a property dispute with her neighbor, Anil. During the discovery phase, Priya sends interrogatories to Anil to obtain details about the property boundaries and any previous agreements. Anil responds but fails to provide detailed information about a crucial agreement and gives incomplete answers about the property boundaries.

Application of Rule 11: Priya can approach the Court under Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking an order that compels Anil to provide more detailed and complete answers to the interrogatories. The Court may issue an order requiring Anil to answer the questions more thoroughly, either by submitting a detailed affidavit or by appearing in Court for a viva voce examination to clarify the information.