Rule 30 of CPC : Rule 30: Substitution of letter for summons.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: A high-ranking government official, Mr. Sharma, is being sued in a civil case for breach of contract.

Application of Rule 30:

1. Court's Decision: The court decides that Mr. Sharma, due to his high rank and position, deserves a mark of consideration.
2. Substitution of Summons: Instead of issuing a standard summons, the court substitutes it with a letter signed by the Judge.
3. Content of the Letter: The letter contains all the necessary details that a summons would typically include, such as the nature of the case, the date of the hearing, and instructions for Mr. Sharma to appear in court.
4. Delivery Method: The court chooses to send the letter via a special messenger to ensure it reaches Mr. Sharma promptly and securely.

Example 2:

Scenario: A prominent business tycoon, Ms. Kapoor, is involved in a civil litigation regarding a property dispute.

Application of Rule 30:

1. Court's Decision: Considering Ms. Kapoor's status and reputation, the court decides to show her a mark of consideration.
2. Substitution of Summons: The court substitutes the standard summons with a letter signed by an appointed officer.
3. Content of the Letter: The letter includes all the details required in a summons, such as the case number, the parties involved, the nature of the dispute, and the date and t...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.