Rule 5 of CPC : Rule 5: Dismissal of suit where plaintiff, after summons returned unserved, fails for one month to apply for fresh summons.
CPC
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Ramesh files a civil suit against Suresh for recovery of a loan amount. The court issues a summons to Suresh, but the process server returns the summons unserved, stating that Suresh has moved to an unknown location.
Application of Rule 5:
- The court informs Ramesh that the summons was returned unserved.
- Ramesh does not apply for a fresh summons within seven days of this notification.
- The court dismisses the suit against Suresh because Ramesh failed to take timely action to reissue the summons.
Outcome: Ramesh's suit is dismissed, but he can file a fresh suit against Suresh, provided it is within the limitation period.
Example 2:
Scenario: Priya files a civil suit against her tenant, Raj, for eviction. The court issues a summons to Raj, but the process server returns the summons unserved, stating that Raj is deliberately avoiding service by not being available at his residence.
Application of Rule 5:
- The court informs Priya that the summons was returned unserved.
- Priya applies for a fresh summons within seven days, explaining that Raj is avoiding service. *...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!