No. 3 of CPC : No. 3: ANSWER TO INTERROGATORIES

CPC

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Case Title: Ramesh Kumar vs. Suresh Gupta

Court: District Court, Delhi

Plaintiff: Ramesh Kumar

Defendant: Suresh Gupta

Interrogatories by Plaintiff:

  1. Did you, on the 15th of March 2023, enter into a contract with the plaintiff for the supply of 100 units of electronic goods?
  2. Did you receive an advance payment of ₹50,000 from the plaintiff on the same date?
  3. Have you delivered the 100 units of electronic goods to the plaintiff as per the contract terms?

Answer by Defendant: In answer to the said interrogatories, I, the above-named Suresh Gupta, make oath and say as follows:

  1. Yes, I did enter into a contract with the plaintiff on the 15th of March 2023 for the supply of 100 units of electronic goods.
  2. Yes, I did receive an advance payment of ₹50,000 from the plaintiff on the same date.
  3. No, I have not delivered the 100 units of electronic goods to the plaintiff as per the contract terms because there was a delay in the shipment from the manufacturer.

Example 2:

Case Title: Anita Sharma vs. Rajesh Verma

Court: High Court, Mumbai

Plaintiff: Anita Sharma

Defendant: Rajesh Verma

Interrogatories by Plaintiff:

  1. Did you, on the 10th of January 2023, borrow ₹2,00,000 from the plaintiff?
  2. Did you agree to repay the borrowed amount within six months?
  3. Have you repaid the borrowed amount to the plaintiff?

Answer by Defendant: In answer to the said interrogatories, I, the above-named Rajesh Verma, make oath and say as follows:

  1. Yes, I did borrow ₹2,00,000 from the plaintiff on the 10th of January 2023.
  2. Yes, I did agree to repay the borrowed amount within six months.
  3. No, I have not repaid the borrowed amount to the plaintiff because I am currently facing financial difficulties and have requested an extension for repayment.

Objection by Defendant: I object to answer the interrogatory numbered 4 on the ground that it is not relevant to the issues in this case.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link