Section 3 of BRJA : Section 3: Interpretation-Clause
BRJA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a farmer, Mr. Sharma, owns a piece of agricultural land in a village near Mumbai, Maharashtra. The land includes not only the soil but also the mango trees he has planted, the crops he is growing, and the paths that run through his farm. One day, the government decides to build a road that will pass through a section of his property. Under the "Land" definition in Section 3 of The Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876, the term encompasses the path on Mr. Sharma's farm, making it a subject of government interest for public infrastructure development.
Consequently, the government assesses the land and calculates the amount it owes Mr. Sharma as "Land-revenue" compensation for the land acquired for the road. This compensation includes not only the value of the physical ground but also the potential earnings from the mango trees and crops affected by the construction.
Throughout this process, Mr. Sharma interacts with a "Revenue officer" who is responsible for overseeing the assessment of his land, determining the compensation due, and ensuring that all procedures are followed according to the laws governing land-revenue in the state.