Section 326 of BNSS : Section 326: Deposition of medical witness.
BNSS
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A criminal trial involving an assault case.
Situation: Rajiv is accused of assaulting his neighbor, Suresh, causing severe injuries. Suresh was taken to the hospital, where Dr. Mehta, a civil surgeon, treated him and documented the injuries. Dr. Mehta's deposition was taken by a Magistrate in the presence of Rajiv.
Application of Section 326:
- During the trial, Dr. Mehta is unavailable to testify in person because he is attending a medical conference abroad.
- The prosecution submits Dr. Mehta's deposition, which was taken and attested by the Magistrate, as evidence in the trial.
- The court accepts the deposition as valid evidence under Section 326(1), even though Dr. Mehta is not present to testify.
- Rajiv's defense lawyer requests the court to summon Dr. Mehta for cross-examination once he returns, as per Section 326(2).
- The court agrees and schedules a future date for Dr. Mehta's examination.
Example 2:
Scenario: A murder investigation.
Situation: Priya is accused of poisoning her husband, Arjun. The post-mortem examination was conducted by Dr. Sharma, a medical expert, who provided a detailed report on the cause of death. Dr. Sharma's deposition was taken on commission under Chapter XXV.
Application of Section 326:
- During the inquiry, Dr. Sharma is unable to attend the court proceedings due to a medical emergency.
- The prosecution pre...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!