Section 311 of BNSS : Section 311: Record in trial before Court of Session.
BNSS
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A high-profile murder case is being tried in a Court of Session in Mumbai.
Details:
- The prosecution calls a key witness, Mr. Sharma, who claims to have seen the accused near the crime scene on the night of the murder.
- As Mr. Sharma testifies, the presiding Judge, Judge Rao, listens carefully and dictates Mr. Sharma's statements to the court stenographer in open court.
- Mr. Sharma describes the events in a narrative form, explaining how he saw the accused at around 10 PM near the victim's house.
- At one point, Judge Rao decides that a specific part of Mr. Sharma's testimony needs to be recorded in a question-and-answer format for clarity.
- Judge Rao: "Mr. Sharma, what time did you see the accused?"
- Mr. Sharma: "It was exactly 10 PM."
- Judge Rao: "Where exactly were you when you saw the accused?"
- Mr. Sharma: "I was standing at the corner of the street, about 50 meters from the victim's house."
- After Mr. Sharma finishes his testimony, Judge Rao reviews the written record, signs it, and it becomes part of the official court record.
Example 2:
Scenario: A financial fraud case is being tried in a Court of Session in Delhi.
Details:
- The defense calls an expert witness, Ms. Gupta, a forensic accountant, to testify about the financial transactions in question.
- As Ms. Gupta explains the complex financial data, the presiding Judge, Judge Verma, directs the court officer to take down her testimony in writing.
- Ms. Gupta provides a detailed narrative of how the funds were allegedly misappropriated, including dates, amounts, and the parties involved.
- Judge Verma decides that certain technical details need to be recorded in a question-and-answer format to ensure accuracy.
- Judge Verma: "Ms. Gupta, can you explain the significance of the transaction on March 15th?"
- Ms. Gupta: "The transaction on March 15th involved a transfer of ₹50 lakhs from the company's account to a personal account, which is highly irregular."
- Judge Verma: "And who authorized this transaction?"
- Ms. Gupta: "The authorization came from the accused, Mr. Kapoor."
- Once Ms. Gupta's testimony is complete, Judge Verma reviews the written record, signs it, and it is added to the official court record.
Update: Our Pro subscription pricing is now simplified. See our Pro plans
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.