Section 269 of BNSS : Section 269: Procedure where accused is not discharged.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Rajesh is accused of theft from a local shop.

1. Evidence Collection: The shop owner and a few witnesses provide evidence against Rajesh. The Magistrate reviews the evidence and believes there is enough ground to presume Rajesh committed the theft.
2. Framing Charges: The Magistrate frames a charge of theft against Rajesh in writing.
3. Reading Charges: The charge is read and explained to Rajesh. The Magistrate asks Rajesh if he pleads guilty or has any defense.
4. Plea: Rajesh pleads not guilty and claims he wants to be tried.
5. Cross-Examination: At the next hearing, Rajesh is asked if he wishes to cross-examine any of the prosecution witnesses. Rajesh chooses to cross-examine the shop owner and one witness.
6. Witness Recall: The shop owner and the witness are recalled, cross-examined by Rajesh's lawyer, and then discharged.
7. Remaining Witnesses: The remaining witnesses for the prosecution are then examined, cross-examined, and discharged.
8. Unavailable Witnesses: Despite efforts, one witness could not be secured for cross-examination. The Magistrate records this and proceeds with the case based on the available evidence.

Example 2:

Scenario: Priya is accused of causing grievous hurt in a neighborhood alterca...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.