Section 107 of BNSS : Section 107: Attachment, forfeiture or restoration of property.
BNSS
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: A police officer is investigating a case of large-scale embezzlement by a corporate executive, Mr. Sharma. During the investigation, the officer discovers that Mr. Sharma has purchased a luxury villa in Goa using the embezzled funds.
Application of the Act:
- The police officer, with the approval of the Superintendent of Police, applies to the Magistrate for the attachment of the villa, believing it to be derived from the criminal activity.
- The Magistrate, after reviewing the application, issues a notice to Mr. Sharma, asking him to show cause within 14 days why the villa should not be attached.
- Mr. Sharma fails to respond within the specified period.
- The Magistrate, after considering the evidence and Mr. Sharma's non-response, passes an ex parte order for the attachment of the villa.
- The Magistrate then directs the District Magistrate to distribute the proceeds from the sale of the villa to the victims of the embezzlement.
- The District Magistrate, within 60 days, ensures the proceeds are distributed to the affected employees and stakeholders of the company.
Example 2:
Scenario: During a drug trafficking investigation, the police discover that Mr. Khan has purchased several high-end cars using money obtained from drug sales.
Application of the Act:
- The investigating officer, with the approval of the Commissioner of Police, applies to the Court for the attachment of the cars, suspecting they are proceeds of crime.
- The Court, believing the cars to be proceeds of crime, issues a notice to Mr. Khan, asking him to show cause within 14 days why the cars should not be attached.
- Mr. Khan responds, claiming the cars were purchased with legitimate earnings.
- The Court, after considering Mr. Khan's explanation and the evidence presented, decides that the cars are indeed proceeds of crime and orders their attachment.
- The Court directs the District Magistrate to distribute the proceeds from the sale of the cars to the victims affected by Mr. Khan's drug trafficking activities.
- The District Magistrate, within 60 days, distributes the proceeds to the affected families and individuals.
- If there are no claimants or any surplus remains after satisfying the claimants, the remaining proceeds are forfeited to the Government.
Update: Our Pro subscription pricing is now simplified. See our Pro plans
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.