Section 29 of BNSS : Section 29: Powers of Judges and Magistrates exercisable by their successors-in-office.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Judge Sharma was presiding over a high-profile criminal case in the Delhi District Court. Midway through the trial, Judge Sharma was transferred to another district. According to Section 29 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Judge Sharma's successor, Judge Verma, can continue the trial from where Judge Sharma left off. This ensures that the trial proceeds without unnecessary delays, and the parties involved do not have to start the process all over again.

Example 2:

Magistrate Rao was handling a series of theft cases in the Mumbai Magistrate Court. Unfortunately, Magistrate Rao fell ill and had to take an extended leave. There was confusion about who would take over these cases. The Chief Judicial Magistrate issued a written order appointing Magistrate Patel as the successor-in-office. Magistrate Patel then took over all the pending cases that Magistrate Rao was handling, ensuring continuity in the judicial process.

Example 3:

In a rural district court, Magistrate Singh was overseeing a land dispute case. Magistrate Singh retired before the case could be concluded. There was uncertainty about who would continue with the case. The District Magistrate issued a written order designating Magistrate Kumar as the successor-in-office. Magistrate Kumar then reviewed the case files and continued the proceedings, providing a seamless transition and avoiding any disruption in the judicial process.

Example 4:

Judge Mehta was presiding over a civil litigation case in the Kolkata High Court. Due to a sudden promotion, Judge Mehta had to leave the case unfinished. The Sessions Judge issued a written order appointing Judge Roy as the successor-in-office. Judge Roy took over the case, reviewed all the previous proceedings, and continued the trial, ensuring that the litigants did not face any delays or need to restart the case.

Example 5:

Magistrate Desai was handling a domestic violence case in the Chennai Magistrate Court. Magistrate Desai was unexpectedly transferred to another jurisdiction. The Chief Judicial Magistrate issued a written order appointing Magistrate Iyer as the successor-in-office. Magistrate Iyer then took over the case, reviewed the evidence and testimonies presented so far, and continued the proceedings, ensuring that justice was served without any interruption.