Section 23 of BNSS : Section 23: Sentences which Magistrates may pass.
BNSS
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Rajesh, a 35-year-old man, was found guilty of theft under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The value of the stolen goods was Rs. 30,000. The case was heard in the Court of a Magistrate of the first class. Given the sentencing powers of this court, the Magistrate sentenced Rajesh to two years of imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 20,000. Additionally, Rajesh was ordered to perform 100 hours of community service, which involved cleaning public parks in his locality.
Example 2:
Meena, a 28-year-old woman, was convicted of causing grievous hurt under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was heard in the Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate. Considering the severity of the crime, the Chief Judicial Magistrate sentenced Meena to six years of imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,00,000. Since the Chief Judicial Magistrate has the authority to pass any s...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
In fact, any online course, certificate program, diploma in International Law, Technology Law, or whatever-new-hype-they-invent is usually just marketing sugarcoat. Don't let them sell you a PDF or Recorded Content and call it empowerment.
A course designed to truly empower you should be accessible — and preferably, free. That's why KanoonGPT will launch a Free AI 101 for Law Professionals course.
Also, quick reality check: Indians earn in INR ₹₹₹ — why on earth are we paying in Dollars $$$ for AI tools ? 🤨 Something doesn't add up.
Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app
