Section 8 of BNSS : Section 8: Court of Session.
BNSS
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Scenario: Establishment of a Court of Session in a New District
Context: The state government of Maharashtra decides to create a new district called "Newtown" due to administrative reasons. According to Section 8 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the state government must establish a Court of Session for this new district.
Application:
- The Maharashtra state government establishes a Court of Session for the Newtown sessions division.
- The High Court of Bombay appoints a Sessions Judge to preside over the Court of Session in Newtown.
- Additionally, the High Court appoints two Additional Sessions Judges to assist with the caseload in Newtown.
Outcome: The Court of Session in Newtown is now operational, with a Sessions Judge and two Additional Sessions Judges handling criminal cases within the district.
Example 2:
Scenario: Temporary Vacancy of a Sessions Judge
Context: The Sessions Judge of the Pune sessions division is on medical leave for two months. There are several urgent applications pending before the Court of Session in Pune.
Application:
- The High Court of Bombay makes arrangements for the disposal of urgent applications by appointing an Additional Sessions Judge from the Pune sessions division to handle the cases.
- If there were no Additional Sessions Judge available, the High Court could appoint the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pune to deal with the urgent applications.
Outcome: The urgent applications are handled without delay, ensuring that the judicial process continues smoothly despite the temporary vacancy of the Sessions Judge.
Example 3:
Scenario: Holding Court Sessions at a Different Location for Convenience
Context: A high-profile criminal case in the Nagpur sessions division involves witnesses and parties from a remote village far from the usual court location. Traveling to the court would be inconvenient for them.
Application:
- The Sessions Judge of Nagpur, considering the general convenience of the parties and witnesses, decides to hold the court sittings in the remote village.
- The Sessions Judge obtains consent from both the prosecution and the accused to hold the sittings at the new location.
Outcome: The court sessions are held in the remote village, making it easier for the parties and witnesses to attend, thereby facilitating a smoother judicial process.
Example 4:
Scenario: Distribution of Business Among Additional Sessions Judges
Context: The sessions division of Bengaluru has a high volume of criminal cases, requiring efficient distribution of workload among the judges.
Application:
- The Sessions Judge of Bengaluru issues orders for the distribution of cases among the Additional Sessions Judges.
- The distribution is done in a manner consistent with The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, ensuring that each judge handles a fair share of the caseload.
Outcome: The workload is evenly distributed among the judges, leading to timely disposal of cases and efficient functioning of the Court of Session in Bengaluru.