Section 38 of BRA : Section 38: Winding Up By High Court
BRA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a situation where XYZ Bank has been struggling financially and is no longer able to meet the demands of its creditors. Despite efforts to stay afloat, the bank's liabilities far exceed its assets, and it is unable to pay its debts. Creditors have been visiting various branches of XYZ Bank to withdraw their funds, but the bank has been unable to fulfill these requests within the stipulated time frame.
Seeing the situation deteriorate, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) steps in to assess XYZ Bank's condition. The RBI finds that XYZ Bank has not complied with mandatory regulatory requirements and is failing to provide accurate financial statements, which indicates the bank's inability to pay its debts. Moreover, the continuance of XYZ Bank is considered prejudicial to the interests of its depositors.
Given these circumstances, the RBI decides to take action under Section 38 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. It files an application with the High Court for the winding up of XYZ Bank, as the bank has become disentitled to carry on banking business in India. The RBI also sends a copy of the application to the registrar as required. The High Court reviews the application and, considering the evidence presented, orders the winding up of XYZ Bank to protect the interests of the depositors and maintain financial stability in the banking system.