APLEA Section 2 : Right of Property in Public Roads, etc., Water and Lands

Act

Summary

Section 2 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, establishes government ownership over public roads, water bodies, and lands, except where privately owned under specific tenures or rights. It clarifies that public roads and streets vested in local authorities are deemed government property, subject to existing public and customary rights.

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example 1: Encroachment on a Public Road

Introduction: Ramesh, a shop owner in a small town in Andhra Pradesh, decides to extend his shop by building a temporary structure on the adjacent public road.

Application: According to Section 2(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, all public roads are the property of the Government. Ramesh's extension onto the public road constitutes an encroachment.

Outcome: The local municipal authority, acting under Section 2(2), issues a notice to Ramesh to remove the encroachment. Failure to comply could lead to fines or legal action, as the road is deemed government property.

Conclusion: Ramesh must remove the structure to avoid penalties, illustrating the Act's role in protecting public property from unauthorized use.

Example 2: Dispute Over Riverbed Ownership

Introduction: A farmer, Sita, claims ownership of a piece of land that includes part of a riverbed, which she has been using for irrigation.

Application: Section 2(1) of the Act states that riverbeds below the high-water mark are government property unless owned by specific entities. Sita's claim must be evaluated against these exceptions.

Outcome: Upon investigation, it is found that Sita's land does not fall under any of the exceptions (e.g., ryotwari tenure or proprietary rights). The riverbed remains government property, and Sita must cease unauthorized use.

Conclusion: This example highlights the importance of verifying land ownership against the Act's provisions to prevent unauthorized claims.

Example 3: Encroachment on a Canal

Introduction: A construction company begins building a residential complex near a canal, inadvertently encroaching on the canal's land.

Application: Under Section 2(1), canals are government property. The company's construction on this land without permission constitutes an encroachment.

Outcome: The government issues a stop-work order and demands the removal of the encroachment. The company faces potential fines and must halt construction until compliance is achieved.

Conclusion: This scenario underscores the necessity for companies to conduct thorough land surveys and obtain necessary permissions before construction.

Example 4: Use of Public Path for Private Access

Introduction: An individual, Priya, uses a public path to create a private driveway to her house, blocking public access.

Application: Section 2(1) declares public paths as government property. Priya's actions interfere with public rights and constitute an encroachment.

Outcome: The local authority orders Priya to restore the path for public use. Non-compliance could lead to legal action and penalties.

Conclusion: This example illustrates the Act's role in maintaining public access and preventing private appropriation of public property.

Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link