APLEA Section 10 : Appeal
Act
Summary
Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, outlines the appeal process for decisions made under the act. Appeals can be made to the Collector from a Tahsildar's decision, to the District Collector from a Collector's decision, and to the Board of Revenue from a District Collector's decision. The section also allows for revision of orders by higher authorities and permits suspension of orders pending appeal or revision.
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1: Appeal Against a Tahsildar's Decision
Introduction: Ramesh, a farmer in Andhra Pradesh, receives an order from the Tahsildar stating that he has encroached on government land. Ramesh believes this decision is incorrect as he has documents proving his ownership.
Application: According to Section 10(1)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Ramesh can appeal the Tahsildar's decision to the Collector. He must file the appeal within the stipulated time frame, providing all necessary documentation to support his claim.
Outcome: If Ramesh successfully demonstrates his ownership, the Collector may overturn the Tahsildar's decision. Failure to appeal within the deadline could result in the enforcement of the order, potentially leading to eviction.
Conclusion: Timely appeal and proper documentation are crucial for Ramesh to protect his land rights under this provision.
Example 2: Revision by the District Collector
Introduction: Sita, a landowner, is dissatisfied with a decision made by the Deputy Tahsildar regarding her land boundaries. She missed the appeal deadline but believes the decision was flawed.
Application: As per Section 10, the District Collector has the power to revise any decision made by a Deputy Tahsildar. Sita can file a petition for revision, explaining the reasons for her delay and providing evidence of the error.
Outcome: If the District Collector finds merit in Sita's petition, they may revise the Deputy Tahsildar's decision. If not, Sita may have to comply with the original order, which could affect her land usage.
Conclusion: Sita's case highlights the importance of understanding revision rights and the need for clear communication and evidence when seeking a revision.
Example 3: Appeal to the Board of Revenue
Introduction: A local NGO is affected by a land order issued by the District Collector, which they believe was made without considering environmental regulations.
Application: Under Section 10(1)(c), the NGO can appeal to the Board of Revenue since the order was not made on appeal. They must present their case, focusing on how the decision violates specific environmental laws.
Outcome: If the Board of Revenue finds the NGO's arguments valid, they may overturn or modify the District Collector's order. Otherwise, the NGO may need to explore other legal avenues.
Conclusion: This scenario underscores the importance of strategic legal action and the role of higher authorities in reviewing decisions.
Example 4: Suspension of Order Execution
Introduction: A business owner, Ravi, receives an order to vacate a piece of land due to alleged encroachment. He files an appeal but is concerned about immediate eviction.
Application: According to Section 10(2), Ravi can request the District Collector to suspend the execution of the order while his appeal is pending. This suspension can prevent eviction until a final decision is made.
Outcome: If granted, the suspension allows Ravi to continue his business operations temporarily. If denied, he may face eviction, impacting his business significantly.
Conclusion: Ravi's case illustrates the importance of understanding procedural rights and the potential for temporary relief during legal proceedings.