Article 13 of CoI : Article 13: Laws Inconsistent With Or In Derogation Of The Fundamental Rights

CoI

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Example Application of Article 13:

Imagine the government of India passes a new law that mandates all media to seek prior approval from a government body before publishing any news article. This law is challenged in the court on the grounds that it violates the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

Applying Article 13, the court reviews the new law and determines that it is inconsistent with the Constitution's provisions that protect the freedom of speech and expression. Therefore, according to Article 13(2), the law is declared void to the extent of its inconsistency with the fundamental rights, and the media can continue to publish without prior government approval.

Update: Our AI tools are cooking — and they are almost ready to serve! Stay hungry — your invite to the table is coming soon.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link