Section 19 of IEA : Section 19: Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit.
IEA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Example 1:
Ravi is a property manager for Suresh. Suresh sues Ravi for not collecting rent from tenant Priya. Ravi claims that Priya did not owe any rent to Suresh. However, Priya had previously stated in a letter that she owed rent to Suresh. Priya's statement is an admission and is relevant against Ravi in the lawsuit, as it proves that rent was indeed due from Priya to Suresh.
Example 2:
Meera is responsible for managing the finances of a company owned by Raj. Raj sues Meera for failing to recover a loan given to a client, Anil. Meera argues that Anil did not owe any money to the company. However, Anil had earlier acknowledged in an email that he owed the company a certain amount. Anil's email is an admission and is relevant against Meera in the lawsuit, as it establishes that Anil did owe money to the company.
Example 3:
Arjun is tasked with collecting payments for a construction project managed by his employer, Vikram. Vikram sues Arjun for not collecting a payment from a subcontractor, Deepak. Arjun contends that Deepak did not owe any payment. However, Deepak had previously confirmed in a meeting that he owed money for the project. Deepak's confirmation is an admission and is relevant against Arjun in the lawsuit, as it shows that Deepak did owe the payment.
Example 4:
Sunita is in charge of collecting membership fees for a club managed by her employer, Ramesh. Ramesh sues Sunita for not collecting fees from a member, Neha. Sunita claims that Neha did not owe any fees. However, Neha had earlier mentioned in a text message that she owed fees to the club. Neha's text message is an admission and is relevant against Sunita in the lawsuit, as it indicates that Neha did owe the membership fees.