Section 240 of BNSS : Section 240: Recall of witnesses when charge altered.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: A theft case is being tried in a district court in Mumbai. During the trial, the prosecution initially charges the accused, Rajesh, with theft under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. However, midway through the trial, new evidence surfaces indicating that Rajesh also committed housebreaking to execute the theft. The court decides to alter the charge to include housebreaking under Section 454 of the Indian Penal Code.

Application of Section 240:

• The prosecutor requests to recall the key witness, Mr. Sharma, who initially testified about the theft but did not mention the housebreaking.
• The court allows the prosecutor to recall Mr. Sharma to question him about the new charge of housebreaking.
• Rajesh's defense lawyer also requests to re-examine Mr. Sharma to challenge his testimony regarding the housebreaking.
• Additionally, the defense lawyer requests to call a new witness, Mrs. Gupta, who can provide an alibi for Rajesh during the time of the alleged housebreaking.
• The court permits both the recall of Mr. Sharma and the summoning of Mrs. Gupta, ensuring that the trial remains fair and just.

Example 2:

Scenario: In a fraud case in Delhi, the accused, Priya, is initially charged with cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. During the trial, it is discovered that Priya also forged documents to commit the fraud. The court decides to add the charge of forgery under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

Application of Section 240:

• The defense lawyer requests to recall the forensic expert who testified about the authenticity of the documents, to question him about the new forgery charge.
• The c...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.