Section 13 of ACA : Section 13: Challenge Procedure

ACA

JavaScript did not load properly

Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.

Explanation using Example

Imagine a scenario where two businesses, Company A and Company B, have a contract that includes an arbitration clause for resolving disputes. A dispute arises and an arbitral tribunal is constituted. Shortly after, Company A learns that one of the arbitrators appointed has a significant shareholding in Company B, which was not disclosed initially.

According to Section 13 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Company A can challenge the appointment of this arbitrator. Since their contract does not specify a procedure for challenging an arbitrator, Company A follows the default procedure by sending a written s...

Login to access all pages and read more content.

To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.

🚀 Special Offer! Enjoy 1 Year of Ad-Free Browsing with any subscription.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Page bookmarking and open in new tab is now supported! Simply use your browser's bookmark manager to save this page for quick access later.
Update: All Judiciary Acts to be available within a week.

Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app

Kanoon Library Android App - Play Store LinkKanoon Library iOS App - App Store Link