Section 35 of AA : Section 35: Punishment Of Advocates For Misconduct
AA
JavaScript did not load properly
Some content might be missing or broken. Please try disabling content blockers or use a different browser like Chrome, Safari or Firefox.
Explanation using Example
Imagine a scenario where a client feels that their advocate has acted unethically by intentionally misrepresenting facts in a court proceeding. The client submits a complaint to the State Bar Council alleging professional misconduct. Upon receiving the complaint, the State Bar Council believes there is merit to the claim and refers the case to its disciplinary committee as per Section 35(1) of The Advocates Act, 1961.
The disciplinary committe...
Login to access all pages and read more content.
To disable ads and read rest of the premium content, subscribe to KanoonGPT Pro.
🚀 Special Offer! Enjoy 1 Year of Ad-Free Browsing with any subscription.
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
KanoonGPT is now faster and smarter, powered by upgraded servers.
Subscribe today and unlock all new features!
Update: Discover how KanoonGPT revolutionizes legal research! Watch our demo video on the homepage to see how you can chat with various legal sections using our innovative hybrid AI search. Enjoy free unlimited AI access for a limited time!
Update: Page bookmarking and open in new tab is now supported! Simply use your browser's bookmark manager to save this page for quick access later.
Update: All Judiciary Acts to be available within a week.
Download Digital Bare Acts on mobile or tablet with "Kanoon Library" app
