Article 2A of CoI : Article 2A: Sikkim to be associated with the Union: Omitted.

Explanation using Example

Example 1:

Scenario: Before 1975, Sikkim was not a full-fledged state of India. It had a special status and was associated with the Union of India in a unique manner.

Situation: Imagine a family living in Sikkim in 1974. They had to follow different administrative rules compared to families living in other Indian states. For instance, they might have needed special permits to travel to other parts of India, and their local government had more autonomy compared to other states.

Change in 1975: After the Constitution (Thirty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1975, Sikkim became a full state of India. This meant that the family now had the same rights and responsibilities as any other Indian citizen. They no longer needed special permits to travel within India, and Sikkim's local government had to follow the same rules as other state governments.

Example 2:

Scenario: A businessman in Sikkim in 1974 wanted to expand his business to other parts of India. Due to Sikkim's special status, he faced several bureaucratic hurdles, such as obtaining special permissions and dealing with different tax regulations.

Situation: The businessman had to spend a lot of time and resources to comply with these unique regulations, which slowed down his business expansion.

Change in 1975: After the amendment, Sikkim was fully integrated into India. The businessman could now operate under the same business laws and tax regulations as any other Indian state. This made it easier for him to expand his business across India without facing the previous bureaucratic challenges.